The anti-ESG backlash is not just an American phenomenon as Europe waters down its sustainability agenda (2024)

A wave of discontent over sustainability policies is sweeping across the Atlantic, making green growth harder and putting the leaders and financiers who are fighting to implement environmental, social, and governance (ESG) policies under pressure. And the upcoming U.S. election will not make life any easier for the companies that are navigating the powerful currents of anti-ESG lobbies.

In Europe, the ardor for ESG regulations has somewhat cooled. The strong polarization around ESG criteria has not waited for the result of the U.S. election. It is lurking in the undertones of financial and standardization talks. The dynamism of U.S. President Joe Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act is still having ripple effects and unforeseen consequences as the IRA compels Brussels to adapt. This trend can be seen in the significant changes in July to the last draft of the new European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS). One of the major changes made by the EU Commission to the European Financial Reporting Advisory Group’s (EFRAG) proposals was to align the ESRS standards with the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) to ensure international interoperability. The die is close to being cast in the European battle over accounting standards–in favor of the ISSB’s softer financial philosophy.

The prospect that truly sustainable finance may be unable to preserve itself looms large over 2024. The idea of a comprehensive fair transition of the economy seems to be morphing into a niche approach to sustainable finance.

Poorly devised communications around ESG investing have contributed to weakening the movement toward a responsible and forward-looking economy. Faced with angry farmer protests, the EU has given up on its goal of halving pesticide use by 2040. Financially illiterate environmental activism is also having a chilling effect on companies. For example, a parliamentary inquiry in France is scrutinizing the environmental commitments of energy giant TotalEnergies. With accusations of “greenhushing,” “greenwashing,” and “woke capitalism,” the three letters “ESG” have become synonymous with backlash.

The rhetoric is simple if one wishes to undermine economic decisions that encourage ethical behavioras a primary concern. It plays upon the fears of Western democratic public opinion amidst growing disquiet in the face of deepening inequality and the fragmentation of the world. Essentially, this rhetoric benefits from the misfortunes of the population. For example, in France and Germany, the far right is cynically capitalizing on the anger of the farmers who have to contend with European Green Deal policies as well as the increase in energy prices. All of this is happening because farmers are being caught up in the middle of the geopolitical reality of an exporting industry with a short-term high exposure to the green transition.

In the long term, however, Europe’s companies, economy, and people will be the ones paying a high price for the policies of cynicism that have no set agendas or tangible projects for the future.

Nevertheless, the green breeze is still blowing gently across Europe. At Davos, French President Emmanuel Macron used his trump card: “at the same time.” It’s a reference to the Paris Agreement formula, “for people and planet,” and the IRA’s philosophy. Indeed, a united Europe can achieve growth and decarbonization “at the same time.” By providing renewed hope for the middle classes and with the help of a sustainability agenda that encourages investments in Europe, Brussels can bolster its mandate.

As the hustle and bustle of the upcoming U.S. elections continues to captivate and sway the opinions of European political leaders, companies in Europe that have always remained neutral in the past, following the customs of the Old Continent, might have to change their way of doing business. They must be more vocal–or 2024 may be the year in which they find themselves trapped by the politics of cynicism.

Camille Fumard is a special advisor on strategic affairs to C-suite executives atEuropean boutique communications agency JIN and theauthorof a book on leadership in the XXIst century.

More must-readcommentarypublished byFortune:

  • Here’show the U.S., Europe, and China are faringin the post-pandemic race for economic growth
  • Working fathers are the new target of microaggressions–and they are worried they could be getting‘daddy tracked’
  • Travis Kelce’s Super Bowl behavior is emblematic ofthe ‘rise of the jerk’
  • The anti-DEI movement has gonefrom fringe to mainstream. Here’s what that means for corporate America

The opinions expressed in Fortune.com commentary pieces are solely the views of their authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and beliefs ofFortune.

Subscribe to the new Fortune CEO Weekly Europe newsletter to get corner office insights on the biggest business stories in Europe. Sign up for free.

The anti-ESG backlash is not just an American phenomenon as Europe waters down its sustainability agenda (2024)

FAQs

Why is the ESG backlash? ›

Political and Ideological Bias: Critics argue ESG introduces political and ideological biases into business decisions, aligning with a progressive agenda. Impact on Financial Performance: There's concern that prioritizing ESG criteria could detract from a company's financial performance.

What is the ESG controversy? ›

An ESG controversy case is defined as either an event or an ongoing situation in which company operations and/or products allegedly have a negative environmental, social and/or governance impact.

What is the negative impact of ESG on companies? ›

The researchers' findings indicate that when companies focus on nonmaterial ESG factors in their quarterly financial updates, investors interpret it as a negative sign, signaling potential issues like higher costs, inefficient resource use, and distracted management.

What are the disadvantages of ESG? ›

One of the main disadvantages of ESG criteria is that companies are not required to disclose all information related to their sustainability practices. This can make it difficult for investors to evaluate the sustainability and ethical impact of investments.

Is ESG a threat? ›

ESG risks, when poorly managed, can have a significant impact on a company's reputation, finances and long-term viability. The effect of these risks can range from fines and legal penalties to loss of customer, employee and investor confidence.

Is BlackRock moving away from ESG? ›

Amidst this global trend, BlackRock, the world's largest asset manager, has taken a bold step by transitioning its investment strategy from ESG investing to a broader approach called transition investing. This move has significant implications not only for BlackRock but for the entire financial industry.

Why did ESG fail? ›

The ESG movement, originally driven by good intentions, has been co-opted by lobbyists, special interest groups and various NGOs, and recent reviews have revealed its lackluster performance in creating meaningful environmental change and have highlighted chronic abuse of flawed methodologies.

Is ESG a political issue? ›

Many ESG-focused efforts are financially material as they have important implications for long-term value creation, but political narrative often undermines this reality. This highlights the need for companies to speak specifically to investors about their ESG initiatives and link them to financial benefits.

Who is behind ESG? ›

The term ESG first came to prominence in a 2004 report titled "Who Cares Wins", which was a joint initiative of financial institutions at the invitation of the United Nations (UN).

Is ESG good or bad for business? ›

Companies with a low ESG score are thought to have the worst environmental, social, and governance impacts. Undesirable ESG scores have also been linked to rising poverty levels in the communities where the firm operates, as well as poor employee mental health.

Which industry is most affected by ESG? ›

Manufacturing is one of the industries with the greatest impact on the environment, society, and governance. Significant ESG concerns threaten its long-term viability and competitiveness.

What are the pros and cons of ESG investment? ›

Pros and cons of ESG investing
ProsCons
Can help investors diversify their portfolioESG funds may carry higher than average expense ratios
May reduce portfolio riskESG investing is still a fairly new concept and there isn't a ton of reporting on performance
1 more row
Oct 20, 2022

Why are people against ESG investing? ›

“They may also argue that considering ESG factors could conflict with a fiduciary's duty to act in the best financial interests of plan participants. Some opponents also believe that ESG investing is politically motivated and could lead to biased investment decisions.”

What are the physical risks of ESG? ›

Physical risks are those related to the physical impacts of climate change such as increased frequency and severity of extreme weather events (e.g.wildfires, cyclones, hurricanes, floods).

What is a weakness of ESG investing? ›

There is a potential for “greenwashing”

Some companies may make claims about their ESG practices that are not fully supported by their actions which can lead to “greenwashing”. This may make it difficult for you as an investor to identify truly sustainable companies.

Is ESG falling out of favor? ›

Activist investors are expected to carry out fewer environmental and social campaigns this year after the strategy proved less lucrative than other shareholder agendas, according to business consulting firm Alvarez & Marsal Inc.

How to deal with ESG backlash? ›

By focusing on business strategy, refining terminology, engaging policy makers, assisting investors, and maintaining perspective, companies can turn ESG backlash into advantage and drive long-term value.

Why are ESG funds down? ›

These days, ESG investments have lost their luster given high interest rates, political backlash, and greenwashing scrutiny.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Lidia Grady

Last Updated:

Views: 6271

Rating: 4.4 / 5 (65 voted)

Reviews: 88% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Lidia Grady

Birthday: 1992-01-22

Address: Suite 493 356 Dale Fall, New Wanda, RI 52485

Phone: +29914464387516

Job: Customer Engineer

Hobby: Cryptography, Writing, Dowsing, Stand-up comedy, Calligraphy, Web surfing, Ghost hunting

Introduction: My name is Lidia Grady, I am a thankful, fine, glamorous, lucky, lively, pleasant, shiny person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.